Drupal, WordPress and Blackcube offer three radically different approaches to content management. Drupal imposes a structured framework with strong conventions, WordPress favors simplicity and extensibility via plugins, while Blackcube bets on total architectural freedom. Each tool responds to specific needs and none is universally better than the others.
Choosing a CMS depends on context: available team, budget, customization needs, technical constraints. This document compares these three approaches to identify which best matches your project. The goal is not to designate a winner, but to clarify each one's strengths and limits according to situations.
The approaches
Drupal: "Learn our system"
Drupal provides complete architecture with strong conventions.
Strengths:
- Complete and structured system
- Smart native cache
- Excellent multilingual
- Proven enterprise solutions
Trade-offs:
- High learning curve
- Strict conventions to respect
- Difficult to go outside the planned framework
Use cases: Standardized enterprise projects, government sites, Drupal-trained team.
WordPress: "Configure with plugins"
WordPress provides simple base, extendable via ecosystem.
Strengths:
- Very easy to get started
- Huge plugin ecosystem
- Massive community
- Perfect for blogs and showcase sites
Trade-offs:
- Structure sometimes difficult to maintain
- Plugin dependency
- Variable performance depending on extensions
Use cases: Blogs, showcase sites, projects without developer, limited budget.
Blackcube: "Code as you want"
Blackcube provides structured content, total freedom over the rest.
Strengths:
- Total architectural freedom
- Guaranteed native performance
- Flexible content without migration
- Automatic granular cache
Trade-offs:
- Requires a developer
- Smaller ecosystem
- No turnkey solution
Use cases: Custom projects, applications with integrated CMS, custom architecture.
Info
These three CMSs respond to different needs. Drupal and WordPress are excellent in their domain. Blackcube positions itself differently: architectural freedom for developers.
Technical comparisons
Content flexibility
Adding an "author" field
Drupal: Admin interface, configuration export and import
WordPress: Specialized extension or custom interface
Blackcube: Structure modification, no data migration
Advantage
With Blackcube, modifying content structure requires no migration. Existing content remains valid, new fields are empty by default on old content.
Code architecture
Product page with recommendations
Drupal: Strict conventions, structure imposed by system
WordPress: Structure via theme and multiple extensions
Blackcube: Free architecture, no imposed constraints
Developer keeps total control of code organization. Blackcube provides content, the rest is managed according to technical team choices.
Performance
Drupal: Sophisticated cache, but navigation sometimes heavy with large trees
WordPress: Depends on extensions, variable performance
Blackcube: Mathematically optimized navigation, automatic granular cache
Multilingual
Drupal: Complete integrated system
WordPress: Third-party paid or free extensions
Blackcube: Base structure provided, free translation logic
Info
Blackcube doesn't dictate how to manage translations. Custom field, dedicated structure, external service... implementation depends on needs.
Detailed use cases
Personal blog
Recommendation: WordPress
Simple, fast, extension ecosystem, huge community. No developer needed.
Multilingual government site
Recommendation: Drupal
Excellent multilingual, validation workflows, proven solutions for enterprise and public sector.
Corporate site with complex business logic
Recommendation: Blackcube
CMS integrated with business logic in same application, custom architecture, native performance. Seamless integration with business code.
SaaS application with marketing pages
Recommendation: Blackcube
CMS integrated in application, same technology, consistent architecture. No separate system to maintain.
Complete e-commerce
Recommendation: WordPress (WooCommerce) or Drupal (Commerce)
Complete e-commerce solutions with payment, stock, delivery. Mature ecosystem.
Warning
For e-commerce, favor proven solutions. Blackcube can manage e-commerce site content, but doesn't provide transactional features.
Decision table
Choose Drupal if:
- Standardized enterprise project
- Complex multilingual with workflows
- Multi-level editorial validation
- Team already trained on Drupal
- Proven enterprise solutions needed
Choose WordPress if:
- Blog or showcase site
- Limited budget
- Non-technical team
- Extension ecosystem desired
- Quick launch
Choose Blackcube if:
- Custom project with specific architecture
- Web application with integrated CMS part
- Total control over code desired
- Critical performance
- Maximum flexibility needed
There is no "best CMS"
Each tool has its legitimate use:
Drupal excels in standardized projects with complex workflows.
WordPress excels in simplicity and accessibility.
Blackcube excels in architectural freedom and performance.
The best CMS is the one that matches context: team, budget, customization need, technical constraints.
Key points to remember
- Drupal: Structured framework with strong conventions, excellent for enterprise
- WordPress: Simplicity and huge ecosystem, perfect for starting fast
- Blackcube: Total architectural freedom, ideal for custom projects
- Contextual choice: No universal solution, best tool depends on needs
- Complementarity: These CMSs respond to different and legitimate needs